Skip to main content

CPC, 1908: Action Guide to Litigation

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Action Guide for Bankers | Banking Digest
Banking Digest · Banker's Reference CPC, 1908 — Action Guide
Recovery & Litigation Reference

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

An action guide, not a summary — 35 sequenced steps a banker takes from pre-filing checks through execution and appeal, each tagged with its governing provision and deadline. Opens with a short introduction to the Code, then moves stage by stage.

35 actions 7 stages 8 tracked deadlines Act No. V of 1908
Introduction

What the CPC, 1908 is — and why a banker needs it

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. V of 1908) is the parent procedural law for civil litigation in Bangladesh — enacted 21 March 1908, in force from 1 January 1909, and extending to the whole of the country (Section 1). It does not create substantive rights; it prescribes how an existing civil right, including a bank's right to recover a debt, is enforced through the courts.

The Code is built in two parts:

  • The body of the Code — 158 sections across 11 Parts, stating the governing principles: jurisdiction, suits, execution, appeal, reference, review, and revision.
  • The First Schedule — 51 Orders with accompanying Rules, prescribing the step-by-step mechanics: pleadings, summons, evidence, judgment, and execution.
Rule of thumb — Sections state the principle; Orders and Rules state the mechanics.

Financial suits are not filed "under" the CPC directly — they are filed under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. But Section 6(1) of the Ain makes CPC procedure applicable wherever the Ain is silent, which is why CPC fluency stays a practical necessity throughout the recovery litigation lifecycle that follows below.

1

Confirm cause of action and limitation status. No suit proceeds without a disclosed cause of action; check the applicable limitation period before instructing counsel.

Order 7, R.1(e)Order 7, R.11
2

Identify the correct court. File in the court of the lowest grade competent to try the suit; confirm pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction before filing.

Section 15Section 6Section 20
3

List all necessary parties. Include every borrower, guarantor, mortgagor, and director — an omission here is a common ground for later objection.

Order 1
4

Check for a pending parallel suit. If the same matter is already before another court between the same parties, filing will be stayed — verify none exists before instituting.

Section 10
5

Draft and file the plaint. Present the plaint with full particulars and relief sought; pay the prescribed court fee at filing.

Order 7
6

Watch for rejection risk. A plaint disclosing no cause of action or barred by law can be rejected at the outset — ensure pleaded facts and documents pre-empt this.

Order 7, R.11
7

Track summons issuance and service. Where ordinary service fails, request substituted service (affixing at a conspicuous place) so the case doesn't stall.

Order 5Order 5, R.20
8

Diarize the hearing date fixed in the summons — the date the defendant must appear or file a written statement.

📅 Calendar it
9

Review the written statement on filing for admissions, denials, and any set-off claimed; prepare a reply/rejoinder promptly.

Order 8
10

Watch for defence tactics that can stall the suit — a strike-out application or a fresh plaint-rejection bid can surface here; brief counsel to respond immediately.

Order 6, R.16Order 7, R.11
11

Attend framing of issues — issues wrongly framed or omitted are difficult to correct later.

Order 14
12

Prepare and produce evidence and witnesses on the court's schedule — missed witness-summoning deadlines routinely cause adjournments that delay recovery.

Orders 16 & 18
13

Obtain the judgment and decree and verify the decretal amount, interest, and costs are correctly recorded before closing the file for execution.

Order 20
14

If the decree is ex parte, remember the defendant can still apply to set it aside — do not treat the decree as final until this window lapses.

Order 9, R.13Art. 164, Limitation Act⏱ 30 DAYS
15

File the execution petition without delay. Calendar the deadline the moment the decree is passed.

Art. 182, Limitation Act⏱ 3 YEARS
16

Confirm the executing court. File before the court that passed the decree, or have it transferred to where the judgment-debtor or assets are located.

Section 38Order 21
17

Move for attachment of property. Identify attachable assets and file for attachment; note statutory exemptions before targeting specific property.

Section 60Order 21
18

Flag any private transfer of attached property as void against the decree — automatic protection, but must be pleaded if the debtor attempts a sale.

Section 64
19

Proceed to sale by auction once attachment is confirmed, following the standard execution procedure.

Order 21
20

Where the money decree remains unsatisfied, apply for arrest and detention of the judgment-debtor — track subsistence-allowance and release grounds so the process isn't challenged on technical grounds.

Sections 55–59
21

For Artha Rin execution specifically, rely on the Ain's own execution chapter first; where it is silent, Order 21 CPC applies — confirmed in Manik K Bhattacherjee vs Artha Rin Adalat (16 BLC 195) and International Tannery vs Judge, Artha Rin Adalat (17 BLC 380).

Ain 2003, ss.28–34Order 21 CPC
22

If the court's own order under the Ain needs correction, move under the Ain's inherent-powers provision rather than filing a fresh suit.

Ain, Section 57≈ CPC Section 151
23

File first appeal to the District Court or the High Court Division depending on forum.

Section 96 / Order 41⏱ 30 DAYS (District)⏱ 90 DAYS (HCD)
24

File second appeal only on a substantial question of law.

Section 100
25

File a review application before the same court on limited grounds — new evidence or an error apparent on the face of the record.

Section 114 / Order 47
26

File revision before the High Court Division where a subordinate court acted without or in excess of jurisdiction. No fixed statutory period — 90 days is settled practice.

Section 115⏱ 90 DAYS (practice)
27

For Artha Rin appeals specifically, confirm the 50% decretal-amount deposit before filing — a precondition, not a formality.

Ain, 2003 appeal provisions⏱ 30/60 DAYS + 50% DEPOSIT

Execution of an arrest warrant or a resisted possession order is not self-enforcing — it depends on police action. Follow-up here matters as much as the filing itself.

28

Route the warrant to the correct police station. Obtain a certified copy/memo of the warrant from the court and forward it to the Officer-in-Charge (OC) of the station covering the judgment-debtor's known address.

Ain, Section 34(1)Order 21, Rr.37–40
29

For inter-district cases, route parallel copies to every relevant station rather than relying on one station to coordinate transfer.

Multi-district routing
30

Confirm the warrant names the executing authority. The officer entrusted with it must bring the judgment-debtor before the court "with all convenient speed" — check this before it leaves your desk.

Order 21, R.38
31

Maintain active follow-up with the police station — track whether the warrant has been served, returned unexecuted, or needs renewal.

No fixed period — track until closed
32

Request police assistance where resistance is offered to delivery of possession — apply to the executing court for a police-assistance direction rather than attempting delivery unprotected.

Order 21, Rr.35–36, 97
33

Arrange police presence when taking possession under a possession certificate — request this alongside the possession application, not after resistance occurs.

Ain, Section 33(5)/(7)
34

Check the arrest exemption before routing a warrant against an heir. Substituted heirs of a deceased mortgagor/guarantor are exempt from arrest and civil imprisonment — verify before forwarding.

Ain, Section 34(2)
35

Log every warrant in a tracking register — case number, date issued, station(s) routed to, and status — so nothing lapses from lack of follow-up.

Internal control

Quick-Reference Deadline Table

The eight dates worth memorizing. Tap a row on mobile to see it as a card.

ActionProvisionDeadline
Set aside ex parte decreeOrder 9, R.13 CPC / Art. 164 Limitation Act30 days from decree/knowledge
File execution applicationArt. 182 Limitation Act3 years from decree
First appeal — District CourtSection 96 CPC30 days
First appeal — High Court DivisionSection 96 CPC90 days
Revision — High Court DivisionSection 115 CPC90 days (by practice)
Artha Rin appeal (suit ≤ Tk. 50 lakh)Ain, 200330 days + 50% deposit
Artha Rin appeal (suit > Tk. 50 lakh)Ain, 200360 days + 50% deposit
Arrest warrant follow-up (police)Ain, 2003 s.34 / Order 21 CPCNo fixed period — track until closed

Banking Digest

Action reference for recovery and legal documentation work. Verify each deadline and citation against the current text of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; the Limitation Act, 1908; and the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (as amended); and applicable Bangladesh Bank circulars before relying on it in a live case. — Manjurul Alam Arif

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Banking Recovery Laws in Bangladesh: Artha Rin Adalat Ain, Negotiable Instruments Act & Contract Act.

Banking Recovery Law Digest · ARAA 2003 · NI Act 1881 · Contract Act 1872 Banking Recovery Law Digest Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 · Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Contract Act, 1872 (Guarantee, ss. 126–147) Author: Manjurul Alam Arif · Practitioner reference — statutory maps, timelines, and traps. All statutory text below is drawn directly from the Acts; verify current amendment status before relying on any provision in a filing, and confirm any case citation independently before use in a document. Jump to Part A — ARAA 2003 | Part B — NI Act 1881 | Part C — Contract Act 1872 ...

A Landmark Judgment on Foreign Travel Restriction in Artha Rin Cases

  A Landmark Judgment on Foreign Travel Restriction in Artha Rin Cases  19 SCOB [2024] HCD 76: Ali Imam Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat & Ors. PDF Case Overview - Court: High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction). - Bench: Mr. Justice J.B.M. Hassan and Mr. Justice Razik-Al-Jalil. - Case Type: Writ Petition No. 2191 of 2022. - Judgment Date: August 4, 2022. - Key Statutes Involved: Sections 6(5), 34(1), and 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003; Article 36 of the Constitution of Bangladesh; Section 7(c) of the Bangladesh Passport Order, 1973.   Core Facts of the Case - The Loan & Lawsuit: International Finance Investment & Commerce Bank Limited (IFIC) filed Artha Rin Suit No. 21 of 2012 against the petitioner (Ali Imam) and others to recover an outstanding loan of Tk. 61,03,31,623.97. - The Bank's Application: During the pending suit, the Bank filed an application under Section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and Section 7(c) of the Bangladesh Pass...

Critical Artha Rin Case Explained: Essential for Credit officers , Practitioners & Law Students

  Artha Rin Adalat (Money Loan Court) cases form the backbone of financial recovery in Bangladesh, especially for banks and Non-Bank Financial Institutions (NBFIs) grappling with cheque dishonour and loan defaults . For legal practitioners and credit officers, navigating its procedural maze is a daily challenge. This analysis breaks down eight critical problems whether you're preparing for the Bar Council exam , drafting a credit recovery report , or providing opinion this structured guide is your practical toolkit. Why These Cases Are Essential: · Execution pitfalls under the ARAA, 2003 · Party addition and locus standi issues · Court fees and registration complications · Handling third-party claims in auctions 📋 Case At-a-Glance Problem- 1 A developer company proposed Mr. “Y” to develop his land which he got from RAJUK by virtue of a lease agreement for 99 years . He informed the developer company that the title deed of his land had been deposited with the Trust Bank as equita...