Skip to main content

Combatting Fraudulent Third-Party Claims on Mortgaged Properties

Recovery & Legal Practice

Combatting Fraudulent Third-Party Claims on Mortgaged Properties

Fraud patterns, red flags, and the relevant Penal Code provisions — click any section to expand.

Fraud Type and Punishment
Fraud Type Typical Conduct Provision Punishment
Cheating and dishonest inducement Using false claims/documents to induce the bank to part with property or act to its detriment Sec. 420, Penal Code Up to 7 years' imprisonment, or fine, or both
Forgery Creating a false document or part of a document Sec. 465, Penal Code Up to 2 years' imprisonment, or fine, or both
Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. Fabricating a deed, security instrument, or similarly serious document Sec. 467, Penal Code Life imprisonment, or up to 10 years, and fine
Forgery for purpose of cheating Making a forged document specifically to deceive another party Sec. 468, Penal Code Up to 7 years' imprisonment, and fine
Using forged document as genuine Presenting a forged deed or paper as authentic Sec. 471, Penal Code Same punishment as for the forgery of that document
Criminal conspiracy Planning or coordinating the fraud with others Sec. 120B, Penal Code Depends on the underlying offence; can be severe if it is serious
Fraudulent concealment/removal of property to defeat creditors Hiding or transferring property to obstruct lawful recovery Sec. 421, Penal Code Up to 2 years' imprisonment, or fine, or both
3.4 Legal significance: This table works best as an insert right after the red-flag section — it links each factual fraud pattern to the criminal provision most likely to apply in a banking-recovery dispute. Punishment ultimately depends on the charge proved, the evidence available, and the court's finding in the individual case.

Legal reference only — not a substitute for case-specific legal advice.
© Manjurul Alam Arif

;

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Banking Recovery Laws in Bangladesh: Artha Rin Adalat Ain, Negotiable Instruments Act & Contract Act.

Banking Recovery Law Digest · ARAA 2003 · NI Act 1881 · Contract Act 1872 Banking Recovery Law Digest Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 · Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Contract Act, 1872 (Guarantee, ss. 126–147) Author: Manjurul Alam Arif · Practitioner reference — statutory maps, timelines, and traps. All statutory text below is drawn directly from the Acts; verify current amendment status before relying on any provision in a filing, and confirm any case citation independently before use in a document. Jump to Part A — ARAA 2003 | Part B — NI Act 1881 | Part C — Contract Act 1872 ...

A Landmark Judgment on Foreign Travel Restriction in Artha Rin Cases

  A Landmark Judgment on Foreign Travel Restriction in Artha Rin Cases  19 SCOB [2024] HCD 76: Ali Imam Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat & Ors. PDF Case Overview - Court: High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction). - Bench: Mr. Justice J.B.M. Hassan and Mr. Justice Razik-Al-Jalil. - Case Type: Writ Petition No. 2191 of 2022. - Judgment Date: August 4, 2022. - Key Statutes Involved: Sections 6(5), 34(1), and 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003; Article 36 of the Constitution of Bangladesh; Section 7(c) of the Bangladesh Passport Order, 1973.   Core Facts of the Case - The Loan & Lawsuit: International Finance Investment & Commerce Bank Limited (IFIC) filed Artha Rin Suit No. 21 of 2012 against the petitioner (Ali Imam) and others to recover an outstanding loan of Tk. 61,03,31,623.97. - The Bank's Application: During the pending suit, the Bank filed an application under Section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and Section 7(c) of the Bangladesh Pass...

Critical Artha Rin Case Explained: Essential for Credit officers , Practitioners & Law Students

  Artha Rin Adalat (Money Loan Court) cases form the backbone of financial recovery in Bangladesh, especially for banks and Non-Bank Financial Institutions (NBFIs) grappling with cheque dishonour and loan defaults . For legal practitioners and credit officers, navigating its procedural maze is a daily challenge. This analysis breaks down eight critical problems whether you're preparing for the Bar Council exam , drafting a credit recovery report , or providing opinion this structured guide is your practical toolkit. Why These Cases Are Essential: · Execution pitfalls under the ARAA, 2003 · Party addition and locus standi issues · Court fees and registration complications · Handling third-party claims in auctions 📋 Case At-a-Glance Problem- 1 A developer company proposed Mr. “Y” to develop his land which he got from RAJUK by virtue of a lease agreement for 99 years . He informed the developer company that the title deed of his land had been deposited with the Trust Bank as equita...