Skip to main content

7th AIBB Quick Prep: Trade Finance & Foreign Exchange

Part A: Broad Questions (20 Marks)

Strategy: Answer any 2 out of 4. Prepare at least 5 topics.

Highest Priority (Asked 4+ Times)

1. Balance of Payment (BOP): Components, BOT vs BOP difference, Causes of deficit in Bangladesh and remedies.
2. Letter of Credit (LC): Operational procedure (Flow chart), Roles, rights, and liabilities of parties.
3. Back to Back (BTB) LC: Definition, Advantages/Disadvantages, Precautions for banks.
4. Export Problems of Bangladesh: Problems in export trade and probable solutions.
5. Domestic vs International Trade: Compare & Contrast, Importance of International Trade.

High Priority (Hot Topics from New Syllabus)

1. Service Export / Freelancing: Challenges and prospects of service export (ICT, Freelancing).
2. Capital Flight & Black Money: Causes of capital flight from Bangladesh and prevention suggestions.
3. Counter Trade: How it helps countries with low forex reserves, Regulations for Bangladesh.
4. Open Account Shift: Bangladesh's preparation for shifting from LC to Open Account.

---

Part B: Mathematical Problem (10 Marks)

Strategy: Answer any 1 out of 2. Do not skip.

Must Prepare:

1. Cross Rate & Costing (UPAS/Usance): Calculation of exchange rate when transit period, swap cost, overhead, and profit margin are involved.
2. Export Bill Discounting: FDBP/Packing Credit calculation.
3. Forward Premium/Discount: Calculating forward rates for import/export.

---

Part C: Case Study (20 Marks)

Strategy: Answer any 1 out of 2. Focus on regulations and bank liability.

Highest Priority Cases:

1. Import LC Discrepancy & Bank Liability: Documents with discrepancies, bank fails to send valid refusal notice (UCP 600 Art 16).
2. Back-to-Back LC Risk (RMG Sector): Master LC received, BTB LC opened, exporter fails to ship, forced loan (SOD) becomes due.
3. Trade Based Money Laundering (TBML): Over-invoicing/Under-invoicing scenarios.
4. Sanctions & SWIFT Screening: False Positive vs True Match.
5. UPAS LC: Interest rate calculation and impact on importers.
6. LIM/LTR Fraud: Importer selling goods without bank consent (Warehouse fraud).

---

Part D: Compare & Contrast (5 Pairs = 10 Marks)

Strategy: Answer any 5 out of 10. Memorize the key distinction.

No. Pair A Pair B Key Distinction
1 URC 522 UCP 600 Bank is Agent vs Bank gives Undertaking
2 D/P D/A Pay immediately vs Accept & pay later
3 Buyer's Credit Supplier's Credit Importer gets loan vs Exporter gives credit
4 Over Invoicing Under Invoicing Capital flight vs Duty evasion
5 Convertible Taka A/C Non-Convertible Taka A/C Can send abroad vs Local use only
6 UPAS LC Usance LC Exporter paid at sight vs Exporter paid at maturity
7 Sales Contract Open Account Legal agreement vs Payment method
8 Speculation Arbitrage Risk taking vs Riskless profit
9 OD Sight Rate BC Selling Rate Interbank rate vs Customer rate
10 FERA 1947 GFET Act vs Guideline

---

Part E: Short Notes (10 Questions = 20 Marks)

Strategy: Answer ALL. Keep answers brief (2-3 lines).

No. Topic Key Points to Mention
1 Deemed Export Goods don't leave country, payment in FC.
2 Net Open Position (NOP) Long position vs Short position.
3 SOFR vs EURIBOR Replacement of LIBOR.
4 UPAS Usance Payable at Sight (Importer usance, Exporter sight).
5 ERQ Account Exporters' Retention Quota (60% general, 70% ICT).
6 NITA Non-resident Investor's Taka Account.
7 Incoterms 2020 DAT replaced by DPU; FCA with onboard endorsement.
8 Force Majeure Acts of God, war, pandemic.
9 Shipping Guarantee Issued when goods arrive before documents.
10 TBML Red Flags Over-invoicing, circuitous routing.

---

Critical Must-Know Facts (For Any Section)

1. "Bank Deals with Documents" Principle: The most repeated quote. It is the core answer for any LC fraud/discrepancy question.
2. Domestic Regulations (GFET):
   · IRC/ERC not required for capital machinery imports.
   · Back to Back LC: Only for bonded warehouse units; maximum 180 days usance.
3. UCP 600 Articles Backbone:
   · Art 2: Complying Presentation.
   · Art 14: Examination standard.
   · Art 16: Refusal notice (5 banking days).
   · Art 20: On Board Notation.
4. Currency Convertibility: Bangladesh Taka is convertible on Current Account (since 1994 - IMF Article VIII), but NOT fully convertible on Capital Account.

---

Summary: Path to First Class (50+/100)

Master these specific areas for a guaranteed high score:

· ✅ Back to Back LC (Process & Risk)
· ✅ UCP 600 Document Examination (Art 14 & 16)
· ✅ TBML Red Flags (Under/Over Invoicing)
· ✅ Compare & Contrast (All 10 pairs listed above)
· ✅ Math (Cross Rate calculation with interest/costing)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Banking Recovery Laws in Bangladesh: Artha Rin Adalat Ain, Negotiable Instruments Act & Contract Act.

Banking Recovery Law Digest · ARAA 2003 · NI Act 1881 · Contract Act 1872 Banking Recovery Law Digest Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 · Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Contract Act, 1872 (Guarantee, ss. 126–147) Author: Manjurul Alam Arif · Practitioner reference — statutory maps, timelines, and traps. All statutory text below is drawn directly from the Acts; verify current amendment status before relying on any provision in a filing, and confirm any case citation independently before use in a document. Jump to Part A — ARAA 2003 | Part B — NI Act 1881 | Part C — Contract Act 1872 ...

A Landmark Judgment on Foreign Travel Restriction in Artha Rin Cases

  A Landmark Judgment on Foreign Travel Restriction in Artha Rin Cases  19 SCOB [2024] HCD 76: Ali Imam Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat & Ors. PDF Case Overview - Court: High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction). - Bench: Mr. Justice J.B.M. Hassan and Mr. Justice Razik-Al-Jalil. - Case Type: Writ Petition No. 2191 of 2022. - Judgment Date: August 4, 2022. - Key Statutes Involved: Sections 6(5), 34(1), and 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003; Article 36 of the Constitution of Bangladesh; Section 7(c) of the Bangladesh Passport Order, 1973.   Core Facts of the Case - The Loan & Lawsuit: International Finance Investment & Commerce Bank Limited (IFIC) filed Artha Rin Suit No. 21 of 2012 against the petitioner (Ali Imam) and others to recover an outstanding loan of Tk. 61,03,31,623.97. - The Bank's Application: During the pending suit, the Bank filed an application under Section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and Section 7(c) of the Bangladesh Pass...

Critical Artha Rin Case Explained: Essential for Credit officers , Practitioners & Law Students

  Artha Rin Adalat (Money Loan Court) cases form the backbone of financial recovery in Bangladesh, especially for banks and Non-Bank Financial Institutions (NBFIs) grappling with cheque dishonour and loan defaults . For legal practitioners and credit officers, navigating its procedural maze is a daily challenge. This analysis breaks down eight critical problems whether you're preparing for the Bar Council exam , drafting a credit recovery report , or providing opinion this structured guide is your practical toolkit. Why These Cases Are Essential: · Execution pitfalls under the ARAA, 2003 · Party addition and locus standi issues · Court fees and registration complications · Handling third-party claims in auctions 📋 Case At-a-Glance Problem- 1 A developer company proposed Mr. “Y” to develop his land which he got from RAJUK by virtue of a lease agreement for 99 years . He informed the developer company that the title deed of his land had been deposited with the Trust Bank as equita...